I am finding that the new LPI NSW Administrative Boundaries NPWS Reserve boundaries are often in conflict with the previously imported Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area.
The Gondwana data also does not name the individual protected area. Is it best to use the most similar polygon (or several similar if any) from the LPI NPWS Reserve boundary data and ‘replace geometry’ of the Gondwana data to keep a history. Then add all the new LPI polygons to make a new multi polygon and add the latest tags to it as normal. Then remove those out of date polygons from the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area multipolygon. If you leave the Gondwana mp with an updated geometry and have a separate new LPI mp, the Gondwana name overlies the LPI name so I can’t see a way to have both. So, does the old Gondwana mp gradually get scavenged by the new LPI data as we add more parks. If so, should we also be adding tags to the newly created LPI Multipolygons to indicate that they are also part of the Gondwana Rainforests of Australia World Heritage Area. how? I expect that I have already mucked up some parts of the Gondwana mp unfortunately. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/protectedareas/GondwanaWorldHeritageArea.htm Nev _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
