On 5/13/2016 9:22 PM, cleary wrote:
I agree that there is a need to improve our classification of places. However I think that taking population as the sole criterion will create more discrepancies than we have already.

I think of it as a guide. In fact most of the OSM wiki to me is a guide.

For example, I live in a Sydney suburb that has a population greater than the gazetted "state suburb" of Sydney (roughly the CBD area). If we adopted a strictly population-based criterion, my suburb and many others with more than 10,000 people would be "towns" in OSM and Sydney CBD be a "town". My suburb has about the same population as the rural city of Griffith, NSW. I think Griffith is a city but my suburb is not.
Yep. I take your point. Closer to home is Penrith .. a city or a suburb of Sydney?
I won't keep going on and on, but there are many questions thrown up by relying on population alone as the criterion for determining if a place is a city or town or whatever. I think it has to be a sort of "common sense" decision taking population into account but other factors as well. But I do support the need to try to clarify our classifications and appreciate the difficulty in resolving the issue.
A start on the classification by features? Warning .. draft only!

A city at a minimum has;

one hospital with emergency services
more than one police station
more than one public library
more than one secondary school
a university
more than one doctor's practice
more than one petrol station
more than one bank
more than one ATM
more than one Post Office

A town at a minimum has;

a hospital
a police station
a public library
a secondary school
a doctor's practice
a newsagent
a petrol station
a bank
a Post Office

A village at a minimum has;

a convenience store


On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 07:11 PM, Warin wrote:
On 5/13/2016 11:36 AM, Warin wrote:
On 5/6/2016 9:51 AM, Simon Slater wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:10:35 AM Ian Sergeant wrote:

1. Any attempt to make something render on sparse parts of the map, is
a rendering issue.  Any renderer is free to pre-process the data based
on a population and remoteness algorithm if they wish.

2. Personally, I make anything a town if it has services.  If it has a
pub, a take-away, a supermarket, a post-office, and a fuel station,
then it's a town.  I save hamlet for a population grouping without any
services, and a locality for a place where there is essentially no
population clustering.  This is a natural skew towards remoter
destinations becoming towns, because they are service towns for
surrounding areas, rather than necessarily having large populations
themselves.

Post offices may be a good guide.  25 years ago there were at least 4 post 
offices
between here (Swan Hill) and Kerang.  Now there is only one at Lake Boga, but
all the other post codes are still in place, mail routing through either
Kerang or Swan Hill.
Australia post has;

 *
    Post Office (PO) and
 *
    Local Post Office (LPO)

The LPO is usually smaller and within another business ..usually a local 
convenience store.

The ABS has this

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/2f762f95845417aeca25706c00834efa/1d90c1ef4ac928d5ca2570ec0018e4f7!OpenDocument <http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/2f762f95845417aeca25706c00834efa/1d90c1ef4ac928d5ca2570ec0018e4f7%21OpenDocument>
"*Identifying towns*

In this review *small towns*have been defined as population centres with between 1,000 and 19,999 people. Towns might ideally be distinguished from cities and from smaller rural communities according to functional criteria, such as the presence or absence of various educational, medical, recreational and retail services, together perhaps with administrative criteria such as whether or not a city or town council operated from within the town. While such conceptual distinctions might be made, it is difficult to put such definitions into practice. The above population size was therefore considered the most suitable alternative which would generally encompass these criteria."

I tend to concur with this - simplest to implement and verify. I do note the 'medical' services that ABS have for identifying towns etc, that may be a usefull criteria in addition to number of pubs, petrol stations etc.


I have gotten some 1,400 'towns from the OSM data base .. many of these have no 
population given, but from those that do;
Penrith         178465
Bunbury         64385
Maitland        61431
Palmerston      46618
Melton          45624
Port Macquarie  41723
Sunbury         33062
Pakenham        32911
Nowra           32556
Albany          30656
Devonport       29051
Goulburn        21484
Busselton       21407
Ocean Grove     16093
Bacchus Marsh   14913
Port Hedland    13772
Torquay         13339
Coolum Beach    13154
Broome          12766
Batemans Bay    12000
Lara            11192
Drysdale        10927

Compare this to the 'cities';
Charters Towers 8,234
Charleville     4,700
Caloundra       3,550
Winton          1,337



Winton and Charleville 'cities' when Broome is not? No .. sorry that makes no 
sense, even when taking into account 'remoteness' and services.

And the other end of 'towns';

Marble Bar      194
Coral Bay       190
Coorow          176
Guilderton      146
Marvel Loch     98
Popanyinning    87
Betoota         0
Ooldea          0

Ooldea used to have a hermit, he could still be kicking ... the others there 
were railway workers with homes elsewhere.
Betoota used to have 1, but he died.
I don't think anyone could call these 'towns'! Even on a 'services' scale.

_There is a clear disparity here. _


I hope to get all the 'towns' populations that are missing entered from the ABS 
census 2011, and then look again at these 'towns'.
I have entered all the 'cities' population data that was missing, so that bit 
is done.

I am yet to get the villages list, if I do!

-----------------------
As a reminder of what I first proposed
OSM wiki presently has by population city>100,000>town>10,000>village>200>hamlet>100
       __I think for Australia;
city>10,000>town>1,000>village>100>hamlet>10

_________________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to