On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same function.
The area is managed by the State of New South Wales and there is
already a admin_level 4 boundary marking that out.
Taken to the extreme councils are subject to the governance by the State
of New South Wales.
For example the amalgamation of councils, placing certain councils into
governance by an unelected official all done by the State Government.
These 'unincorporated areas' have some part of the gobermint
administering them ... as such the have an entity preforming at least
some of the actions of a 'local council' (building approvals for example).
The most logical place to have that data in under the 'local government'
section.
Interesting review dated 2013
http://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/Strengthening-Far-West-Communities-Supporting-Information-Volume-3.pdf
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
