I believe these are the same paragraphs in CC BY 2.0 and 3.0, but in any case you need to check the licence text as particularly in the case of AUS the licences are sometimes customized and the numbering may have changed.
Simon On 17.03.2017 22:49, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Thanks everyone for your input here - it's all getting very hard :-( > > Simon, thanks for the info re the "official" position. That page > mentions "a similar document for obtaining the necessary waivers for > the 2.0 and 3.0 versions of CC BY > <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3PN5zfbzThqX0NNdFBDejE2RFE/view?usp=sharing>.",but > that document only says CC-BY-2.0. Is it simply a matter of replacing > 2.0 with 3.0? There is mention made of Sections 4a & b of CC-BY-2.0 - > do those same sections apply in 3.0? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On 18 March 2017 at 05:46, Simon Poole <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ > <https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/> for our > (LWG) position. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
