Hi again, I was interested what happened here, and I got deeply involved in this case. As I said before, we are seriously taking GPS traces in account.
If you look following picture (http://i64.tinypic.com/30t5jq9.png), it clearly indicates that most of the traffic is in the right area (where is red line), and it can indicate that imagery is offsetting. It can also indicate that this particular lane is used most of the time. So in both cases you have to make proper estimation. The second thing is that this area is completely reconstructed (even that ground-level road which can be proved in Aerial view and GPS traces as well) and it is impossible to know with 100% accuracy which trace is taken before and which one is after the reconstruction. Personally, I think both edits are good. Especially because offset is marginal, one lane wide. DareDJ aligned road to GPS traces, you aligned to the imagery. Also, these road links has no traces after reconstruction, so it is really hard to know how much imagery offsets. http://i68.tinypic.com/25g1f.png As I said before, I will fully take care about this case in Microsoft team. Please note that we are here at your disposal and we are trying to expand coverage and fix as much as possible issues. Thank you once again for your time, Nemanja On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Ewen Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I tried to email you the Overpass but there was an error - let me know > when you have it and I will delete this post > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yyB > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Australia-f5416966.html > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
