Thanks Andrew. I'm working with the Targomo API (https://www.targomo.com), which does consider sidewalk tags, if present.
I won't be removing the already mapped footways. You are correct - shouldn't interfere. Cheers, Adam Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:17:04 +1000 > From: Andrew Davidson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Pedestrian/bike access near Wiley Park > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 15/8/18 02:18, Adam Roberts wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I'm experiencing some routing difficulties for ped/bike near the Wiley > Park > > station, and looking for some tagging and digitizing advice. > > Just out of interest: which router are you using? I haven't been able to > find one that consumes the sidewalk tag. > > > Sidewalk tags seems the most straightforward, as I won't > > need to connect each sidewalk via crosswalks, but that would likely > involve > > removing the mapped sidewalks south of The Boulevarde, and replacing as > > tags. Would that be ok? > > Not really. > > Is there any reason why you can't combine both mapping schemes? All that > sidewalk=left means is that somewhere to the left of this way there is a > footway/cycleway. If you also map that footway/cycleway then the tag is > still correct. I don't see why you would have to delete the > footway/cycleway. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
