I'll look there. Thanks.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Warin wrote: > On 07/10/18 11:22, cleary wrote: > > > > In regard to admin boundaries sharing the coastline, I think that would > > also be incorrect but I am less confident of my view on this. > > > > I did update some administrative boundaries in South Australia using the SA > > Government Data and those boundaries did not coincide with the coastline > > (see the coastline around Streaky Bay, Ceduna, Fowlers Bay and near the > > Nullarbor). The coastline in OSM needs a lot of work - I have looked at > > parts of WA and SA but found it very difficult to use the satellite imagery > > correctly to refine the map of the coastline in areas where there are > > extensive mudflats or large tidal flows and even rocky areas just > > under/above the waterline. But I suggest it is safest, and more accurate, > > to map the administrative boundaries and the coastline separately. > > Might be good to look at Broome for hi/low tide .. there is a fair > distance between the two there so it would be easy to pick in that > location. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
