On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lee Mason <lee.ma...@outlook.com.au> wrote:
> But in categories 2-6, it contradicts and lists specific protection titles > for a protect class. > > Sorry, that was me. I added that note to protect_class=1 a number of years ago but forgot/was too lazy to copy it to the other categories. I've fixed that now. > Speaking from a Tasmanian example, Conservation Areas span from IUCN 1a to > VI. But the vast majority are IV, V or VI. > > Yeap, if you look at the talk page you'll find a comment from me making this same point. That's why a look-up table based on names won't work in Australia. > I think type=boundary and boundary=protected_area for the relations. > Type=multipolygon is more for physical objects such as water, wood, etc. > > > JOSM uses different validation rules if you use type=boundary or type=multiploygon. So you'll get some non-applicable warnings if you tag a boundary=* with type=multipolygon.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
