Why not: name=Stand F, Strathfield Station addr:street=Albert Road
On 22/1/19 11:26 am, Michael Collinson wrote: > In Sweden, I have seen the "F" going into the ref tag. Just a thought, I > don't recall how it affects rendering in common schemes. Con: Clash with > a more rigorous ref num giving by the transport authority, "40459" or > such. Another (complementary) practice is to put just "F" as the name - > which has the secondary benefit of being more likely to render out in a > crowded space. The other detail perhaps being better suited to the > corresponding bus_station node/area/relation. > > Else, +1 from me, the proposal seems useful to me as a smart refinement > of local practice. > > Mike > > On 2019-01-22 10:26, Warin wrote: >> Are there any dissenters? >> I'll give it a week. >> Any feed back from other places In Australia? >> On 21/01/19 20:00, cleary wrote: >>> As a regular user of public transport, I agree. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Warin wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> At present the names of bus stops goes something like >>>> >>>> name=Strathfield Station, Albert Rd (Stand F). >>>> >>>> >>>> The web transport trip planers direct you to Stand F, yet this is not >>>> very visiblein OSM renderings as that information is last. >>>> >>>> >>>> Would it not be best to have the name put the more detailed information >>>> first and the generalproximity information last, much like an address? >>>> >>>> Such as >>>> >>>> name=Stand F, Albert Rd, Strathfield Station >>>> >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
