All methods are in current use: An example of A: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.04169/151.12293 An example of C: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-33.67210/151.11468
I wasn't aware of platform_edge https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform_edge but in light of the detailed wiki write-up of it, I think it's better if we migrate to B. So map the whole platform area, but then add linear ways for platform_edge along the sides. On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 21:44, Ewen Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm interested in the preferred way of creating a sandwich railway platform > where > a) there are railway lines on both sides and > b) trains stop to pick up passengers on both sides and > c) there are few physical barriers between both platforms and > d) there is sufficient aerial imagery to allow detailed platform layout > > Is it better to > a) split the platform in the middle or > b) add platform_edge and include platform number as the reference or > c) no need to do anything, the reference="platform 8/9" on the platform > polygon suffices and platform_edge is overkill. > > Thanks in anticipation > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Australia-f5416966.html > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
