Am 2019-07-25 23:48, schrieb Andrew Harvey:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 21:12, Aleksandar Matejevic (E-Search)
<[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
I haven't followed Wiki blindly because it can be contradictory
sometimes, that's the reason why I'm asking these questions here.
Also, I think that gov routes are there to indicate importance of
the road and flow of traffic.
I would personally wait for couple of more opinions regarding this
before reverting suggested road classification. If there are any
local mapper for these areas It would be great if they could turn
into conversation to give an opinion?
I think we have enough comments here, and documentation on both the
highway=motorway and Australian Tagging Gudelines wiki page (that Seb
just pointed out) to say that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110348897/history and the rest of
that road should be reverted, as it's clearly not a highway=motorway.
A bit OT but I noticed that the previous version had bicycle=yes. This
is also an an aspect that contradicts my understanding of a highway.
Many major roads, even toll ways have bicycle signage and it seems to be
accepted to use by bike. This is very different from e.g. Germany where
this is forbidden on an Autobahn.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
