Thanks for that information I will defiantly work on implementing those. Thanks, Ben.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 21:09, Michael Collinson <m...@ayeltd.biz> wrote: > I usually mark all residential buildings, including the main house or > strata building, as building=residential. I feel it useful but safe. I > usually map in Sweden where planning regulations encourage a plethora of > out-buildings whose use is difficult to judge from imagery: garages, spare > rooms, wood-sheds, saunas, children's play rooms, yada yada. When I am > unsure if a building is actually part of a residential plot, then I go for > building=yes and can check them out on visits. > > Mike > On 2019-08-12 11:46, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been tracing in residential swimming pools and I have not as yet > found an appropriate tagging for the small poolside buildings that (from my > experience); may have an area to get changed and to store pool-toys, > chemicals and other pool care items. > > My current guess is just to mark it as: building=yes > > If there are any other tags I have missed or if I'm just being blind and > missing something obvious, I would like to hear your option/response. > > Thanks, Ben. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing > listTalk-au@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
