Why did he remove the bridge tag?
On 5 October 2019 8:16:35 pm AEST, Andrew Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: >On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote: >> >> >https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770 > >> > >Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another prioblem with >using the path tag: highway=path bicycle=designated is currently >rendered differently to highway=path bicycle=yes. As previously >discussed, in Australia the only difference between yes and designated >can be the cycleway being old enough for the bikes to have worn the >markings off. So we'd end up with a map that just tells us where the >signage is still OK. > >> the likes of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24377739 in >> Perth would also fit too. > >Oh marvelous. Having edited the wiki page he's now editing the map to >match his new tagging policy: > >http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=24377739 > >> the 1-liner descriptions you >> see at e.g. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values >> reflect this use > >Classic OSM documentation...the one hand can't agree with the other. > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-au mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
