To avoid opening a can of worms, I've been waiting for them to upgrade to CC BY 4.0 before asking for the LWG waiver and instead relying on the pre-waiver permission. They said they were planning to move to CC BY 4.0 but that was about a year and a half ago.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 07:04, Dion Moult <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the six maps overlays come from NSW LPI Web Services, which we > have permission and compatible licensing and attribution information for: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/New_South_Wales_Government_Data > > Could be wrong, though. > > As for specifically mapping lot boundaries, using the layer to check other > things is OK, but just in case there is any misunderstanding my belief is > that we should not map actual lot boundaries if they are invisible on the > ground. If it coincides with an actual physical object, like a fence, then > it's mappable :) > > Dion Moult > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:48 PM, Mateusz Konieczny < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Note that permission to access is insufficient. > > We need this data on odbl compatible licence to use it for mapping. > > 23 Oct 2019, 14:40 by [email protected]: > > G'day guys, > > Looking at the sixmaps website they have a lot boundaries overlay which > does exactly what it says on the tin. Would it be worthwhile requesting > permission to access this? My thoughts are that it could assist with > armchair mapping for determining whether a road is for public access or > whether its actually just a long driveway or the like? We already have the > imagery dates overlay in iD so I presume it wouldn't be too difficult to > add? > > Interested to hear your thoughts. > > Cheers, > Luke > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
