Thanks Edoardo, just wanted to make sure :-) Thanks
Graeme On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 07:05, Edoardo Neerhut <[email protected]> wrote: > Permissions have already been granted Graeme for Mapillary to provide the > imagery and data to OSM. You can read more about rights for OSM with > Mapillary images and data here <https://www.mapillary.com/osm>. > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 07:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Do we need the various Councils' permission to use this data, or are we >> jut using it out of Mapillary, which I believe is "legal"? >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme >> >> >> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 06:55, Edoardo Neerhut <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Excellent Daniel. >>> It is likely some 2019 imagery will be imported this year as well for >>> the Port Adelaide area, so hopefully that makes it a bit easier to pick up >>> some addresses. >>> >>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 23:49, Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Port Adelaide Enfield* >>>>> >>>>> The City of Port Adelaide Enfield has uploaded 228,000 images and just >>>>> shy of 1,000 km of coverage. They are using the uploaded imagery to update >>>>> their traffic sign inventory. >>>>> >>>>> This imagery consists of road surveys but also surveys of the >>>>> footpaths taken on quad bikes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> That's... a pretty amazing level of detail! A few other contributors >>>> and I have chipped away at buildings in the council; and we've maybe got >>>> 40%? coverage. Getting addresses onto those or number of levels seemed out >>>> of reach by ground survey. >>>> >>>> Will be interesting to see what can be derived from the two datasets >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
