Oh yes that part about you not doing the import was clear. I agree with Sebastian, it depends on the type of the other existing feature.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 23:52, Reuben via Talk-au <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry if I wasn't clear, I didn't actually do the import, I just want to > consolidate nodes that were created in the import with existing features. > On 22/11/19 5:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > Do you have an example? I don't quite understand what you mean by > combining the nodes? Combining the nodes with what? Is this about if the > address point should exist on a dedicated node or on a building or other > amenity or poi? > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:20, Reuben via Talk-au < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am just asking about what is the preferred action for combining the >> nodes imported as part of an address import. >> ( >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brisbane_City_Council_Property_and_Address_Import >> in this instance, but could be applied to others) >> >> 1. Moving the tags from the imported nodes to the way/relation and >> deleting the imported node >> 2. Duplicating the tags and leaving the imported node intact >> >> My preference is 1, as this means less redundant nodes. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Reuben >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
