& done! Thanks
Graeme On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 10:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks fellas! > > Back to it, then :-) > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 22:08, Sebastian S. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I use a node for most. >> Only if there is a distinct clearing in the middle of nowhere or a marked >> helipad then I use an area. >> >> On 11 January 2020 8:56:01 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 17:56, Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Question re this Map Roulette task, thanks. >>>> >>>> I take it these details have come from a NPWS list of some form that >>>> says there is a landing site at "this" spot. >>>> >>> >>> Yes that's right. >>> >>> >>>> So, even if it shows as just a patch of bare ground, we tag it as a >>>> landing site? >>>> >>> >>> This dataset is saying that the patch of bare ground is a landing site, >>> either an emergency one or actual helipad. Remember we're not just mapping >>> any available patch of bare ground as an emergency landing site, only those >>> which NPWS have designated as emergency landing sites. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Node or area? >>>> >>> >>> Up to you both are fine, but unless there is some kind of boundary you >>> can see I'd just go with a node. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Of the few I've looked at, one was a very discernible flattened out >>>> square of dirt which I tagged as an area, another was just a clearing in >>>> the forest so I put a node there, while the third was just a spot in an >>>> open paddock. >>>> >>>> & it would appear that emergency=landing_site doesn't render in any way >>>> - does that matter? >>>> >>> >>> That's okay, typically something only starts getting rendered by maps >>> and apps once it has some usage, so actually mapping it helps justify >>> getting it into maps and apps. >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
