I think it's fine to map these in OSM, like all other things in private property it does make it harder to validate and determining the exact crop from imagery might be a stretch, but I don't think this is enough of a reason to not map.
I agree with the suggestion of natural=tree_row + denotation=agricultural + crop=grape is best. These are all well documented and in-use tags and this use matches the description of what they are for. On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 15:13, John Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, I'm doing some work with a community agriculture group looking at > adding vineyard-related features to OSM, at this point starting with just > vine rows. > > Vineyards themselves (ie. the polygons that contain the rows) are often > tagged with landuse=vineyard and crop=grape [1][2]. > > I can't see anything relevant to this in the Australian tagging > guidelines. Looking more broadly, it looks like vine rows haven't been > widely mapped before. > > For vine *rows* (ie. the linear features within the vineyard), we've had > suggestions of natural=tree_row, denotation=agricultural, and crop=grape, > but not totally confident about this. > > Does anyone here have any thoughts or suggestions? > > Thanks > John > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard > [2] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=vineyard#combinations > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
