If the edits are accurate, legally acquired, ethical and respectfully build 
upon the work of previous mappers then, imo, so be it. “Necessary” vs 
“unnecessary” has never been a criteria for inclusion in OSM. If it were, heaps 
of edits would be up for challenge. You’ve informed the editor that the edits 
are not necessary and, assuming they’ve read your comment, they are clearly 
happy to continue adding them. So be it. We all have different interests and 
pre-occupations. That’s what makes OSM so unique and interesting, even if it is 
frustrating at times. It’s a big map.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to