Hi Ian, How would you match the different map set, the government one to OSM? And how will you validate the matching is correct?
Regards, John On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 14:41, stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > To be clear, Ian, I'm not saying this use of data is an import, as you > have said and as it appears to me and others, it is / would be using the > data as a "filtering process" in a workflow. As such, I'm good with that. > > The points I was making are that 1) data drift over time and 2) there are > some in OSM who say that "verified on the ground" data are superior to > other forms of "published" data (via satellite or by governments). A > corollary could be that one of the more strong rebukes you might receive > (and I haven't heard any here yet) is that you are using government data, > rather than "ground-truthed" data. Fine. Again, I'm OK with what and how > you are doing this, I think you are getting a lot of "green lights" as > feedback. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
