On 2021-10-28 8:05 p.m., [email protected] wrote:
If it exists on the ground, it gets mapped. If there is no legal access, that's access=no or access=private. If it's a path that has been created by traffic where it's not officially meant to go, it's informal=yes.
Yep, this is how it is supposed to be handled. Removing paths that exist on the ground is vandalism, and counter-productive because the paths will be remapped
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
