If OsmAnd fundamentally misinterprets/misrepresents access tags, that's not "disappointing", that's a critical bug that needs to be fixed ASAP.
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/11668 Cheers, Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: Warin <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 30 October 2021 18:01 To: Phil Wyatt <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [talk-au] "Removing closed or illegal trails." (in Nerang National Park) On 29/10/21 10:23 pm, Phil Wyatt wrote: > I think OSMAND only works to exclude access=private, not access=no It does not exclude, the private ones are still there .. but rendered differently. Unfortunately you are correct in that access=no is the same as having no access tag. Boo, disappointing. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Warin <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 29 October 2021 10:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [talk-au] "Removing closed or illegal trails." (in Nerang National Park) > > > Some renders can show the difference. OSMand has a setting to show access... and it works. > > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
