On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 11:05, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we should just stick with the AWTGS as it stands. It seems to be > gaining widespread government support, and even if it is not perfect, it > seems like a standard that is going to stay with us. >
So, working on this idea, looking at https://www.ffm.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/21475/dse_trail_grade_brochure_tagged.pdf, & having a play, a first draft comes up with something like: *AWGTS Class 1* *Criteria* *OSM* Distance Xxx (<5k) Distance=4.5 Gradient Flat incline=no steps=no Quality Well formed surface=paved / compacted Wheelchair OK wheelchair=yes Markings Sign-posted trail_visibility=excellent Time (closest 15 / 30 minutes / Duration=00:15 / 15 minutes Hour / half-day / day) Experience Nil All the rest slot rather well into existing tags, although "incline" may be a bit iffy?, but don't know what to do with the "Experience" field? The Guide says: Class 1 / 2 - "No experience required" Class 3 - "Some bushwalking experience recommended" Class 4 - "Experienced bushwalkers" Class 5 - "Very experienced bushwalkers" A new key perhaps: AWGTS_scale=1-5, with descriptions as above? What do you all think? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
