Thanks for having a go at it, Scottie. I was watching the conversation
but didn't feel confident enough in my experience with highway tagging
hierarchy.
As a local (Brisbane but not CBD), I agree the roads that directly
connect to the motorway/expressway need to at least be classified as
secondary, and that Mary and Adelaide could be demoted to tertiary.
Adelaide st is an interesting case in that it is very important to bus
traffic but doesn't connect to the road network like others.
Happy with its current state, and it looks quite similar to what
Queensland Globe shows in its Roads and Railway layer, so there's some
more validation...
Cheers
On 14/3/22 13:49, Dean Scott wrote:
As a local to Brisbane, I have fixed the roads to better represent the
importance of them in terms of connectivity to other roads around the
Brisbane CBD.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195
Scottie
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195>
Changeset: 118452195 | OpenStreetMap
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195>
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and
free to use under an open license.
www.openstreetmap.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, 14 March 2022 1:12 PM
*To:* Andrew Davidson <[email protected]>
*Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
Still no response from anybody here, so might throw it out to the
Tagging list to see what people world-wide think?
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick
<[email protected]> wrote:
& it would have helped if I posted my original message, as I
intended to! :-(
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015884.html
As I said then, to me personally, looking at Brisbane CBD:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-27.4701/153.0343, (but the
other major cities would be the same), the main grid of the
busiest streets should probably be Secondary with smaller streets
as either Tertiary or Minor / Unclass?
One comment on the =secondary talk page pretty well agrees:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
I'm amazed though that there appears never to have been any
discussion on this previously?
Just looking at other major cities, most of them seem to be a mix
of primary & tertiary, with only a few secondary, except for
Manhattan, NY, which has lots of both primary & secondary with not
that many tertiary.
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:14, Andrew Davidson <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Brought that same question up a little while back, but no
response.
Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway
classification is so
low I don't think your email even registered with me.
Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it
is pretty
useless for deciding what to do in urban areas.
Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that
issue with a
note that nobody has an opinion on the subject.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--
Stéphane Guillou
http://stragu.gitlab.io/
You can encrypt our communications by using OpenPGP. My public key 4E211060 is
available on the keys.gnupg.net server.
Other ways to interact with me are listed on my contact
page:http://stragu.gitlab.io/contact/
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
