Hey Mark,
I asked on Discord and both the ref on ways and on relations are used by
different data consumers. While newer consumers use the relation, many
older ones will use the way.
I'd be in favour of keeping the old_ref tags where the value is known.
In Melbourne, at least, there are a lot of old road signs that will be
hanging around long after the conversion happens in the area.
Dian
On 2022-09-05 19:53, Mark Pulley wrote:
Just a question about when (if) we do this. In the past I've placed the
network/ref tags on both the relation and on the individual ways. Do we
need the route number details on the ways as well, or can these be
deleted from the ways?
Also, do we still need the old_ref tags (e.g. old route numbers prior
to conversion to alphanumeric routes)?
If we go ahead with this change, I've got some time in the next few
weeks, so am willing to volunteer to work on this.
Mark P.
On 26 Aug 2022, at 8:00 pm, Dian Ågesson <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello all,
Following on from a previous discussion on the mailing list [1], I've
put together guidelines that would allow us to implement AU: prefixes
in our route network tags.
The content is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Diacritic/Proposed_Australian_Routes
I am looking for affirmation that this change is a good idea and
should be implemented in Australia.
Dian _______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Links:
------
[1]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-August/016399.html_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
