Yes, happy to add produce=timber to the State Forests. Timber Reserves not productive yet and may be used otherwise in future.
Interesting that landuse=forestry should not be used on relations. Most state forests are mapped as multipolygon relations. I prefer to leave landuse=forest for now, but do prefer to change to landuse=forestry if OSM contributors decide that is most suitable solution. > On 12 Sep 2022, at 4:55 pm, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > > If intended to produce timber then > > produce=timber > > Also consider a duplicate with landuse=forestry ... see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforestry > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforestry> This is an > attempt to get away for the 'tree cover' use by others. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
