Exactly. It looks like the website might also show "cycle friendly" streets which on the ground may have no infrastructure or signage, so not something we would map.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 10:52, Ben Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > Practically, using this data would be difficult I think. > > Partly because there is a lot of stuff already mapped. The other problem > is that I have found Councils' web sites are a bit optimistic about how > much of their planned cycling infrastructure actually exists. It's hard > to know what is "on the ground" from their data sets. > > - Ben. > > > On 7/2/2023 10:40 am, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi > > Looking further City of Sydney Data Hub is licenced CC By 4.0 but OSM > > has been waiting on the waiver since 2020 "CC BY 4.0 - waiver sent > > 01/12/2020, "considering your request" on 03/12/2020" > > > > The licence for the cycle network data links to 2 logos, a CC by 4.0 > > logo and a "Open Data" logo which I can only find 2 other occurrences > > of in the net and no definitions. > > > > Tony > > > >> Hi > >> First check that its listed at > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources > >> If not ykou probably need to get them to sign a release > >> Tony > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I have been looking into cycle paths data in OSM and found that Sydney > >>> doesn't seem to have this dataset: > >>> > https://data.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/datasets/cityofsydney::cycle-network/explore > >>> > >>> > >>> This data is focused on the city centre. Are there any > >>> recommendations on > >>> how I should get about this, or if there are any best practices or > >>> guidance > >>> when uploading datasets from official sources? > >>> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
