Sounds good to me! Thanks
Graeme On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 at 11:15, Andrew Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > I would leave off boundary=protected_area until they have IUCN > Categories assigned. It doesn't add any more information than > leisure=nature_reserve. > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 11:52 AM Little Maps <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, landuse=forest is widely used to denote State Forests in OSM, > due to legislated landuse of timber harvesting. However, from 1 Jan this > year, timber harvesting is now banned in all native forests in Victoria, so > the problematic landuse=forest tag is no longer appropriate. > > > > I’m seeking feedback on the most appropriate tag to use now. Down the > track, individual decisions will be made on conservation / recreation / > Indigenous management priorities in each reserve. In the interim, are there > any objections to replacing landuse=forest with the following tags… > > > > boundary=protected_area > > leisure=nature_reserve > > > > plus name tags etc, and mapping separate natural=wood etc boundaries as > needed. Among other advantages, getting rid of landuse=forest will make > vegetation mapping a lot simpler in State Forests in Vic. Cheers Ian > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
