On 25/11/24 09:55, [email protected] wrote:
Quoting Andrew Harvey <[email protected]>:
I'd consider using abandoned:highway=track + highway=footway/path
abandoned:*=*
Still visible but fallen into serious disrepair and which could only
be put
back into operation with considerable effort
Hi all, I know I am getting close to suggesting tagging for the
renderer but I am inclined to keep similar lifecycle tags for those
cases where the land manager requests that the track not be rendered
and the land manager is working actively to maintain a state of
abandoned:
Consider the case of a vehicle track which is impassible to vehicles
but traffic-able to walkers. It could be tagged
abandoned:highway=track or
highway=path
_
_Think you mean, at least this is what I'd be using
abandoned:highway=track and
highway=path
If there are lots of abandoned:highway which are traffic-able by
walkers and not access=no, it is just incentive for renderers to
render abandoned:
Most would take the major tag of highway=track and ignore was:* or
abandoned:*. Only if the 'lessor' tag of abandoned:* (or disused:* etc)
existed by itself would someone consider rendering it._______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
