I think I did. I think it serves no purpose, also, it was connected wrong on
most
of the junctions. After reading a bit, I found a page (from Ben?) that
describes it
not being a good idea do to so.
I also think it should never ne drawn seperate, as, "logically" it's the same
road,
"fysically" it's just seperate built there for the purpose of it being a very
dangerous
road, and to provide some form of protection to cyclists.
Tim
>
> I think I was a little bit to fast.
>
> It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466&lon=5.0184&zoom=13
>
> The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The
> way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as
> a cycleway. In the online editor everything looks correct.
>
> Is it not better to have a seperate way as lane for bikes ? If I am not
> mistaken the lane is seperated from the road by trees, but I am not sure
> there.
>
> kind regards,
> Bart
>
> Ben Laenen schreef:
> > Bart Vanherck wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Someone did made a cycleway of the way between Diest and Geel. Is there
> >> a reason for that ?
> >
> > Which way do you mean exactly? I can't find anything wrong.
> >
> > Ben
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: helpt je meer voor elkaar te krijgen. Ontdek Windows 7.
http://windows.microsoft.com/windows-7_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
