On Monday 10 October 2011 21:19:56 Marc Gemis wrote: > I use both openwandelkaart and Lonvia to check my edits. Recently, I > noticed that some walking networks are rendered differently in Lonvia. The > routes have a rectangle with 2 characters (ZD - Zuid-Dijleland and KH - > Kempische Heuvelrug). Furthermore some routes have a proper lavel (ZD > 100-101) instead of just the ID of the object. > > Rivierenland - > http://hiking.lonvia.de/?zoom=13&lat=51.09385&lon=4.40489&layers=FFBT0 > (also click Routes in lower right corner) > vs > Zuid-Dijleland - http://hiking.lonvia.de/?zoom=13&lat=50.7784&lon=4.60522 > > Is this the new standard to tag regional walking networks ? Can this be > documented on the wiki ?
That happens when you use the name=* tag for the network name on these routes. As with cycle node networks, don't use the name=* tag on the routes. > Another question is regarding the name of those networks. Apparently, the > name of the brochure (see http://www.wandelroutes.org/wandelnetwerk.htm ) > does not always match the name on the signposts. > > E.g. Kempense Heuvelrug (brochure) is Antwerpse Kempen (signposts) > In het land van Stille Waters (brochure) is Scheldeland (signposts) > > Which name is preferred ? Should we somehow mention both names ? > Or is e.g. Antwerpse Kempen a superset of the Kempense Heuvelrug ? Use the one on the signposts. Greetings Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
