On Monday 12 November 2012 14:55:00 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: > While dealing with borders, I discovered this unidentified multipolygon > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/150921> fortuitously. > Then I loaded the members and I found landuse = forest on one, that > makes it correct on the map. > Isn't landuse = forest supposed to be tagged on the relation instead?
There always have been two methods of doing this since multipolygons were invented: tagging the relation, or tagging the outer way. Tagging the relation is somewhat prettier indeed. > One of my messages is to beware of Bing. > At higher (closer) zooms, it may have in some places an erroneous offset > <http://www.google.be/search?&q=bing+offset+%28higher+OR+lower%29+zoom>. > I think that the lower zooms are always the correct ones. > JOSM allows to set an offset to compensate. One always have to be aware of possible offsets in the imagery, but in Belgium I think it's all pretty good. I've actually never even encountered a place where one has to re-align the images (which doesn't mean there aren't any of course). Long time ago I checked a few of the national geodetic points and see how they align with the imagery, and the result was "very good". Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
