I really tried but he sure pissed me off. I fixed everything he did wrong, he's thinking: Hey, it's a military cemetary (it is ...) so lets add a node smack in the middle and call it: historic=battlefield. He uses amenity=kindergarten to mark leisure=playground.

He also deleted information on a building ( amenity=doctor ) I personally added. He also managed to disconnect ways in order to add 1 footway. Also parking nodes, placed over parking ways (which I put there ages ago). So he's not even looking at what is there. Luckily he only did 5 changesets.

So clearly a beginner.  They should forbid people to edit with potlatch.

I actually already fixed 2 of his mistakes few days ago in my .be overhaul on the designation key, which is totally cleaned up now.

Glenn


On 06/24/2013 10:00 PM, Jo wrote:
Please be gentle when explaining him where he goes wrong :-) We need all the fresh blood, I mean mappers we can get...

Jo

2013/6/24 Glenn Plas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    The Eppegem cemetary is like 1200 meters from my doorstep, I never
    saw a battlefield reference on the cemetary.  Whats worse is , in
    his other edits he's adding parking space where I've already done
    all the parking space around.  user has 5 edits on his name:

    http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/fransvm

    I'm originally from Bonheiden, so I'll take a look there too after
    I see what has been done here.

    Glenn



    On 06/24/2013 09:37 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
    I'm interested in the usage of historic=battlefield.

    I saw that someone added this to e.g. to a cemetery in Eppegem
    (Zemst)
    http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2308368137

    There are also a lot of those tags around Bonheiden - Rijmenam -
    Keerbergen:
    
http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/?zoom=13&lat=51.00577&lon=4.56379&layers=B0000FT

    Are these really battlefields or are they bunkers, cemeteries
    (something else) ?
    Can the tag
    (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dbattlefield )
    also be used for those purposes ?

    regards

    m


    _______________________________________________
    Talk-be mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be


    _______________________________________________
    Talk-be mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be




_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to