Hi everyone, As i'm a bit surprise that the warning raise only now after more than 2month of integration, I feel that the DWG is legit to raise concerns about any unadvertized ongoing imports.
Now, as the urbis "import" look more like a manual process than a bulk and blind edit and that the effect is really limited in surface.... I don't consider it as a risk for the osm community as the tiger import was for example...( the data quality is also a lot better ). I think that one think that make this import more DWG friendly is to be sure to properly "replace" the existing buildings ( Replace Geometry (Ctrl+Shift+G) with utilsplugin2 ) and to properly check for duplicate and other problems. regarding the 2 account as long as we stick with proper changeset tagging i don't really see the point.. Regards Brice aka eMerzh
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
