2013/10/2 Gilbert Hersschens <[email protected]>: > Ik denk dat de foto bij > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway duidelijk is. Een > bord C3 met onderbord is niet hetzelfde als een bord D7. >
Via deze pagina vond ik https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium Kent iemand die pagina ? Een van de uitspraken is bv. dat designated niet nodig in België is. "There's no reason for a "designated" access tag in Belgium as there is no reason why one has more rights over the other on any of these highway types when different vehicle types have access to a road. "designated" is therefore synonym with "yes". Footways could both be signed with a sign that doesn't show a pedestrian at all, and one that does, so basing a designated tag on traffic signs is also flawed." ----- English Version >From the page mentioned by Gilbert, I discovered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium. It states e.g. that the key designated is useless in Belgium: "There's no reason for a "designated" access tag in Belgium as there is no reason why one has more rights over the other on any of these highway types when different vehicle types have access to a road. "designated" is therefore synonym with "yes". Footways could both be signed with a sign that doesn't show a pedestrian at all, and one that does, so basing a designated tag on traffic signs is also flawed." groeten/regards m _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
