On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:54:26AM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote: > > I thought the consensus from an earlier discussion here was > > > > 1) addr:housenumber + addr:street on building (not as node) > > 2) for those that want to do it: associatedStreet relation with name, > > If you use a associatedStreet relation, you want to set the street > only once there and not for each node or building. > > then some quality assurance tools will start complaining. and since their developers don't like associatedStreet relations, their will never be a fix. Many simple apps based on OSM also ignore the associatedStreet relations, so you will never have a complete address. Even OpenLinkMap requires it I believe As a programmer I'm in favor of the associatedStreet relation (do not repeat the same data over and over), but I also see that the OSM community is not ready to use it. regards m
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
