|
On 2013-10-18 08:38, marc bessieres
wrote :
Le 17 oct. 2013 22:56, "André Pirard" <[email protected]>
a écrit :
>
> On 2013-10-17 21:19, marc bessieres wrote :
>> 4) In OSM inspector I see that way_id : 233946835 is
reported as error because it has no tags. I see that it is the
inside of a school. I thought of creating a multipolygon with
the external border and this way as the internal border, is this
the right way?
>
> It looks like the outside is drawn twice, of which the one
sharing the walls with the houses seems to come from Urbis.
> Simple way: you may tag the interior with the same name of
the school. Not sure about adding leisure=playground inside.
> Harder way: Relation:multipolygon with roles outer and
inner for each wall.
> In that case, the tags are put in the relation and the
walls can have no tags.
>
Thank you, I didn't notice. Should I remove the
import from urbis or the manual map, I presume the latter. And I
can go to either solution for the playground, what is the
preferred way?
You should remove the manual map. It's less precise and it even
crosses the Urbis houses.
On 2013-10-18 09:05, Jo wrote :
André suggested to use leisure=playground for the
'speelplaats' of a school. To me leisure=playground stands
for speeltuin/plaine de jeux. The inside of a school where
children play during their breaks is something else,
unless it's open to the public to come and let their
children play there all the time.
Normally it should be enough to simply not tag it at all. If
it's the inner part of a multipolygon, it already serves its
purpose to make a 'hole' in the building.
I agree but I found no better and it seemed obvious that it's
private.
A little more digging and I found that it should be
landuse=recreation ground
access=private
surface=...
To be checked, of course.
I could have sent the school a cc: of this but you can't do that
with a stupid SMS like contact form, can you.
Cordialement,
|
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
