I agree with that, address:street is easily to change or view at all apps for smartphones or tablets too.
2013/11/15 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> > Got this answer from lonvia on help.osm.org > > You've mapped it correctly, Nominatim is just not very good at updating > associatedStreet relations. It's a known > bug<https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4619> > . > > Here is what happened: you've originally put the house into this > associatedStreet > relation<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2594673> which > does contain the 'Pierstraat - Matenstraat' street. Nominatim simply uses > the first street it finds in such a relation for the name an ignores all > tags on the relation itself, so that is where the name comes from. Later > you have moved the house to the new relation and that move was not caught > by Nominatim's update process. The houses will only be updated when they > are changed themselves again. > > > > also interesting is this quote from lonvia in the above mentioned bug: > > > Nominatim would be perfectly happy if you added only addr:street tags and > got rid of the associatedStreet relations. The relations mostly don't carry > any additional information and are a bit of a pain to handle. addr:street > is much better supported. > > So I wonder more and more whether we should add those theoretically nice > associatedStreet relations.... > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> the help thread is here: >> https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28075/how-to-correctly-map-a-pois-address >> >> seems that Nominatim was not updated after the associatedStreet-relation >> update >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I'm reading >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Development_overviewagain, >>> especially the section on "Building indexing" >>> >>> Buildings, houses and other lower than street level features (i.e., bus >>> stops, phone boxes, etc.) are indexed by relating them to their most >>> appropriate nearby street. >>> The street is calculated as: >>> 1. The street member of an associatedStreet relation >>> 2. If the node is part of a way: >>> 2.1 If this way is street level, than that street >>> 2.2 The street member of an associatedStreet relation that this way is in >>> 2.3 A street way with 50/100 meters and parallel with the way we are in >>> 3. A nearby street with the name given in addr:street of the feature we >>> are in or the feature we are part of >>> 4. The nearest street (up to 3 miles) >>> 5. Not linked >>> >>> >>> It seems that it takes one of the streets from the associatedStreet >>> relation to work with. The segment should be long enough (longer than >>> 50-100 m ?). It then works with this street. It simply ignores the tags on >>> the associatedStreet. This would make the relation useless to solve any >>> issue regarding name and postcode for streets that are the border between 2 >>> villages. >>> >>> >>> The 2 names in the standard tag are "required", otherwise many QA-tools >>> will complain name:left/right is not recognized, or are they ? (yeah I know >>> do not tag for ... :-) ) >>> You can't use a semi-colon in the name (to indicate multiple names) >>> otherwise another bunch of QA-tools complain that there are 2 names on a >>> "highway". >>> >>> BTW, the postcode is also wrong in my example. It should be 2840. >>> >>> It has time, Glenn, it's wrong for several weeks now, so a day more or >>> less does not matter. >>> >>> m >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ben Abelshausen < >>> ben.abelshau...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>wrote: >>>> >>>>> If it can wait I'll check this evening with full attention. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's up to marc. But I guess he would like to see his work be made >>>> into something useful. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> Met vriendelijke groeten, >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Ben Abelshausen >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-be mailing list >>>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Ivo De Broeck Valleilaan 13 3360 Korbeek-lo tel +32 16 43 84 93 gsm +32 486 17 61 13 spanje tel +34 966 841 726 gsm +34 603 661 778
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
