On 26-11-13 14:22, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Glenn Plas <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
that's not even accurate for our side of the border. omfg. This
constitutes a huge amount of work to create this beast, and I
wonder why one would hurt himself like that.. Now, how to go about
removing this totally useless relation.
Removing the belgian parts will require deletions on the relations, and
you can bet someone has that zone under watch , so we will eventually
trigger a reaction from them.
I would suggest not to remove it but just to move it's boundary to the
french border. I think this is the result of a french landcover import.
It is, the changeset comment says it's coming from an import. (but then
they violated the 'dedicated account' point by doing this via a real
user account )
Jo might know this, he also follows the fr-list I think.
We should ask them why they use a relation in the first place.
Things like this are the reason you need a human to review automated
imports before the push. common sense is hard to program ;-)
Glenn
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
