On 16-09-14 15:24, André Pirard wrote: > On 2014-09-16 10:43, Glenn Plas wrote : >> Hi, >> >> I noticed some update of our einzelganger TAA putting up addres >> information on the way. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I think this >> is not correct, check way: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24301581#map=19/50.96972/4.47523 >> >> Now he put a 'name' key + an addr:street key in it. I'm about to >> delete this mistake but I wanted to make sure that no radical changes >> have been implemented lately making this ok. >> >> Let me know what you think. > I checked it as requested and I see nothing wrong in this
Thanks, that must be since my fix I've already committed, check the previous version of this way instead. > > bicycle <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle?uselang=en> yes > highway <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway?uselang=en> > residential > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential?uselang=en> > maxspeed <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed?uselang=en> > 50 > name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en> > Damstraat > > > except that bicycle=yes is meaningless if there's no other tag > forbidding bikes such as access=no. > It's a very very very common mistake all over the country making newbies > believe that it's forbidding cars. > It should be removed. Will do. There is no cycleway at all, it's a small street, barely wide enough for 2 cars to pass. That tag is probably not from his last edit but from years ago. You can still see his changeset and what changed here: http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=25463368 Greetings Glenn > The mapper may have meant cycleway > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway>=track or some other > variant of that. The arm-chair bing mapper would probably not even know what's out there in real live though. Glenn _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
