Could you please help me out with properly referring to umap/maperitive? Actually I'm interested in even making a map style of my own but I have not looked into it deep enough.
I've tried something out: http://piratepad.net/H7J6nGybr7 You should all be able to edit this. Thanks Ruben/M!dgard PS: I'm not from Ostend and the only thing I can remember doing there was while adding all the beaches in Belgium, back in my very early days. ;) 2015-02-02 12:59 GMT+01:00 Sander Deryckere <sander...@gmail.com>: > > > 2015-02-02 12:55 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>> Asking to free the toilets dataset wouldn't hurt either (they don't even >>> have to do anything technically, we can just copy it from the OSM-based >>> printed map and the listed addresses). >> >> >> Is that after they'd give their consent to do so? Or is the fact they used >> OSM as the background enough to have freed that dataset? That would be very >> surprising. >> > That's after their agreement. Displaying different datasets on top of each > other (without mixing them) doesn't trigger the share-alike clause. > >> >> Anyway, I agree that it would be far better if we could include those >> bathrooms in our data. At that point they could render a map based solely on >> OSM with an empasis on what they deem important to show on such a map. I >> think it's important to tell it to them that way. Maybe point them to umap >> or maperitive as well. >> >> Jo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
