Marc, I don't know what's going on here. I checked my query, and it does include relations. In fact, here a relation actually shows up: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#18/51.18539/4.39963 And here nothing: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#18/51.15785/4.39513 I don't understand why relation 6302488 would behave any differently from 6265218.
Unrelated: why would you not just tag the closed line itself as a dog park? (no criticism, just couldn't think of any advantages) 2016-06-10 6:43 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As an alternative, we could so something like this: > >> > http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#16/51.1953/4.3929 > >> This takes the live open data feed for dog parks (places where you are > >> allowed to unleash your dog) from Stad Antwerpen and shows it together > with > > Joost, do you include relations for the dogparks ? I just added 2 dogs > parks in this [1] area and the are not show in red. > I typically draw a closed line for the fence and then make a > multipolygon for the area. I recently started using this technique > while I'm working on landuse. I think I saw this method described for > the first time (for me) by Dieterdreist. > > regards > > m > > > [1] > http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/vergelijking-hondenloopzones_88766#17/51.15664/4.39480 > -- Joost @ Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
