On 01-07-16 16:30, Marc Gemis wrote: > I totally agree with you on that. I'm one of Glenn's beta testers and > I have noticed that depending on the town, the data given by GRB/Crab > can be good or very bad/outdated. > Also the data is rather limited in the types of buildings that it > recognizes, which is a problem for me.
That is why you need humans to import it. And that is why I want a feedback system which I yet have to make. We should mark bad source data in OSM with a key/value combination. And we need to mark bad GRB data as well and make this available to the public. I'll not be entering a case is LARA for every error I find. We need to think about the next mapper as well, so if someone sees a structure doesn't match GRB , I want to prevent him from (bring to attention) from creating an error, rather that recognise OSM has better data. I see this a lot: structures with wrong dimension. But that is exactly why we don't blindly import stuff. Glenn _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
