Hallo Marc, Don't know that much about busses, I assume others (Jo ?) will reply to this. But you could ask (as a changeset comment) why they changed the names so they do no longer comply with the Belgian "rules". This is often the best way to understand a certain change. They other just have to guess the intent of the mapper that actually made the change.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Bessières, Marc <[email protected]> wrote: > ) I wanted to create the name:fr and name:nl for Quai aux Briques - > Baksteenkaai > > And I noticed there were 3 errors in Osmose because there are 3 different > ways with exactly the same tags and connected to each other. > > Is it normal? Or should they be merged together? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30272973 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12818280 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30272972 > > As for streets represented by different ways, there might be good reasons to have separate ways: - different characteristics : surface, maxspeed, ... - only a part of the street is part of a route (bus, cycle, hiking, etc.) I don't see differences in this particular case, but I might have overlooked one. But in general, you do not need to take the time to remerge a street that is split in several ways. regards m. _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
