This is a better, cleaner query, accounts for addr:street nodes as well http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iCO
On 28-09-16 11:44, Glenn Plas wrote: > So, we are talking about this data : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iCN ? > > the addressed way's (e.g. buildings ) need to match the streetname they > belong to. > > Structure is always a great thing for data, so it doesn't matter which one. > > Glenn > > > On 28-09-16 11:08, Marc Gemis wrote: >> The order on name can be random. But once you chose e.g. FR - NL, all >> the addr:street tags for the addresses in that street have to follow >> FR - NL. For another street you can take another order. >> >> This weird rule of FR - NL or NL - FR as name is something from the >> Belgium community. You cannot expect that all tools honour this. How >> can a tool know that in this small place on earth the name field is a >> concatenation of two names? By using FR - NL as name, you tell all the >> tools that the name of the street is "FR - NL". So you have to use >> that name everywhere you refer to the name of the street, which means >> the field addr:street has to be "FR - NL" as well. >> You do not use different names for addr:street and name for roads in >> Flanders, do you ? >> >> IMHO, this is not mapping for the tool, but is mapping in a consistent >> way. Once the order is determined for a street, we also agreed not to >> change it, so once cleaned up, there is no longer an issue. >> >> But if people don't care about the first impression people get when >> looking up an address in Brussels, fine for me. >> But it is already bad enough that when you look for Zutphen in a Dutch >> browser, you find "Zütphen". >> All those little things might turn people away from OSM... :-( >> >> m. >> >> p.s. alternatively, you could use an associatedStreet-relation to >> solve this problem. But this is not one of lonvia's preferred >> solutions. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, joost schouppe >> <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm not sure I understand correctly, but isn't the order of languages in the >>> general name tags supposed to be random (for political reasons)? If so, >>> shouldn't Nominatim be able to deal with this randomness? >>> It sounds a bit strange to expect the data to follow the same randomness in >>> the name and addr:street for different objects. Then upon every edit of a >>> new object, you would have to check which randomly selected order of names >>> is present on the street itself. >>> >>> To me, it looks a bit like "mapping for the tool" if we do clean this up. >>> But I might be missing the point. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-be mailing list >>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
