Wow, for the faciliteitengemeenten I don't agree either! For Brussels I don't really care that name has "fr - nl" order in a consistent way.
For faciliteitengemeenten it should be official language only in name and name:fr, name:nl as fits. Polyglot 2017-04-07 12:34 GMT+02:00 Gerard Vanderveken <g...@ghia.eu>: > Ik lees ook : > *These municipalities should have the official translated names under > name:nl <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:nl>=*, name:fr > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:fr>=* and name:de > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:de>=* (depending on which > language facilities are offered), the name > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name>=* tag should contain only > the official name in the primary language. For the moment, the > municipalities bordering Brussels also follow the naming schema used in > Brussels (with both languages in the name tag), while the other > municipalities have a tendency to only include a single language in the > name tag. Do not delete translated data by following this rule. If a good > translation exists in a dutch municipality in french, do not remove it. We > only care for correct data, as much as possible without being intrusive in > any way. * > Ook de dubbele standaard voor de taalfacileitgemeenten rond Brussel lijkt > mij niet aangewezen. > Ofwel doe je voor iedere faciliteitsgemeente in de name tag alleen de > officiele taal, ofwel beiden in volgorde van officiele - faciliteit. > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Gerard. > > > Ben Laenen wrote: > > On Friday, 7 April 2017 11:28:32 CEST Marc Gemis wrote: > > > I just stumbled upon the wiki > pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Brussels > I was surprised to read e.g. "Note that the "first mapper rule" is > deprecated now." and "In OSM, we have a consensus to use a fixed > order" (both changes made by Gplv2 on Oct 19, 2016) > > Not that I care about the order of French and Dutch on those > streetnames, but it would be nice to inform the community about such > an important change via the mailing list, not ? If this is indeed the > consensus I would have violated it since I did not know deprecation of > the first mapper rule. > > I asked Gplv2 to point me to the discussion leading to the consensus. > > So I have no problems with this being the consensus, I do have a > problem that such an important change is made without informing the > mailing list. > > > There was a small talk about it around that time in the thread "Some > information about Nominatim for addresses in Brussels" on this mailing list. > > But there was no real discussion to change it, and certainly no consensus. > > Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing > listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
