@Ruben: I will fix when I come upon one.

@Steven: I think I didn't notice because the rendering-color is the same as the 'unmapped area' around the nearby footpath (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517185144)


Pieter Brusselman
/Cartografie ~ Projectmedewerker/

(logo boompja) <http://www.tragewegen.be>

*A* Kasteellaan 349 A, 9000 Gent
*T* 09 / 331 59 27
*W *www.tragewegen.be

logo facebook <http://www.facebook.com/tragewegen>

ter info: ik werk niet op vrijdag

Op 18/10/2017 om 21:53 schreef Steven Clays:
Strange, because http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465851481 renders perfectly.

2017-10-18 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ruben <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:04:01 +0200, Pieter Brusselman
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made = pier' on the Zuidlede. Those
    > items don't show up on the map.  Perhaps due to the rendering_style.
    >
    > I was looking for some examples and i found:
    >
    http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340858#map=18/51.05555/3.73357
    <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340858#map=18/51.05555/3.73357>.
    > Here, the pier/staketsel is mapped as a 'building'. I don't
    think this
    > is realy a building :-).

    That is due to an illegal and very badly performed import.

    Do not pay attention to any tags that endless_autumn has added.
    (Or fix them :) )

    _______________________________________________
    Talk-be mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
    <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>




_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to