@Ruben: I will fix when I come upon one.
@Steven: I think I didn't notice because the rendering-color is the same
as the 'unmapped area' around the nearby footpath
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517185144)
Pieter Brusselman
/Cartografie ~ Projectmedewerker/
(logo boompja) <http://www.tragewegen.be>
*A* Kasteellaan 349 A, 9000 Gent
*T* 09 / 331 59 27
*W *www.tragewegen.be
logo facebook <http://www.facebook.com/tragewegen>
ter info: ik werk niet op vrijdag
Op 18/10/2017 om 21:53 schreef Steven Clays:
Strange, because http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465851481 renders
perfectly.
2017-10-18 14:47 GMT+02:00 Ruben <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:04:01 +0200, Pieter Brusselman
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time ago I mapped some 'man_made = pier' on the Zuidlede. Those
> items don't show up on the map. Perhaps due to the rendering_style.
>
> I was looking for some examples and i found:
>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340858#map=18/51.05555/3.73357
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340858#map=18/51.05555/3.73357>.
> Here, the pier/staketsel is mapped as a 'building'. I don't
think this
> is realy a building :-).
That is due to an illegal and very badly performed import.
Do not pay attention to any tags that endless_autumn has added.
(Or fix them :) )
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be