They have explicitly asked to map this sometime back, so license-wise it's not a problem IMHO. The license was also meant to be as close as possible to the Flemish Open Data License, which is deemed OK.
Should we go to imports for a single multipolygon? I don't know, but it sounds a little strange to me. 2018-02-01 10:13 GMT+01:00 wannes <[email protected]>: > Geen ervaring met importeren: kan (en MAG!) deze geimporteerd worden van > http://opendata.antwerpen.be/datasets/lage-emissiezone-afbakening > http://opendata.antwerpen.be/gratis-open-data-licentie > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:52 AM, joost schouppe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There are now two low emission zones in Belgium, neither of which is >> mapped. You will find all the needed info to map them on this wiki page: >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlow_emiss >> ion_zone#Belgium >> >> Anyone up to the challenge? >> >> -- >> Joost Schouppe >> OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | >> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup >> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> > > > -- > wannes > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
