OK, thanks. I’ve talked to the mapper and it was a mistake, indeed, not a "new tagging scheme". Problem solved.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:24:46 +0200 Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > int_ref only on way. > I think most motorways in Belgium where mapped correctly, before this change. > > Perhaps a mistake of the user which selected ways and nodes before > adding/changing the int_ref ? > Feel free to reach out to the mapper that made the mistake. > > regards > > m. > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:26 AM Yves bxl-forever > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I came across something fishy: > > > > node > > [int_ref="E 411"] > > (50.792806,4.417019,50.823614,4.481392); > > out; > > > > > > It seems that someone is routinely applying the "int_ref" tag on all > > individual nodes of motorways. This seems weird and it duplicates a lot of > > information, because this is normally already there on the way. > > > > If that is not okay, I’ll try to get in touch with the mapper who did that. > > Is anyone familiar with how to map motorways properly? > > > > Thanks. > > Yves > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-be mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
