Caro prof. Hasenack, Muito obrigado pelo e-mail anterior indicando que podemos usar os dados. Recebi uma resposta da comunidade internacional e preciso corrigir um detalhe do que eu disse a vocês. Antes, uma pergunta crucial: é suficiente "citar" a fonte acrescentando a tag "source=Labgeo-UFRGS" a cada um dos objetos importados no mapa? Essa informação só estaria disponível em modo de edição.
Quanto à atribuição na página de copyright ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright), parece ser mais restrita às fontes que disponibilizam seus dados comercialmente (sob copyright) e não para contribuidores que produzem seus dados sem fins lucrativos, como seria o caso do Labgeo. Para esse, o lugar adequado seria nesta página do wiki (à qual muitos têm acesso de edição): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors Então, eu preciso perguntar a vocês novamente se citar o Labgeo nesta outra página é atribuição suficiente para vocês. Eu solicitei que colocassem um link pra essa página a partir da página de copyright, de modo a garantir uma visibilidade similar a todos, mas pode demorar pra fazerem. Eu estava um pouco desatualizado, a comunidade parece ter iniciado um movimento no sentido de solicitar aos contribuidores se aceitam ou não os "termos do contribuidor" ( http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms). Acredito que o objetivo seja se proteger de futuros problemas legais. Eles têm acumulado a informação aqui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue Assim, não querendo abusar da boa vontade de vocês, gostaria de pedir (sem urgência) um texto curto (nem precisa usar linguagem muito rebuscada), apenas ressaltando os pontos 2, 3 e 4 dos termos do contribuidor, que são: 1. Que a OSMF tem o direito de usar como bem entender os dados contribuídos pelo Labgeo nesse momento (o Diagnóstico Ambiental disponível no site) para qualquer fim, inclusive fim comercial, por tempo indeterminado 2. Que a OSMF pode sublicenciar esses dados contribuídos sob a licença DbCL 1.0 (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1-0/) 3. Que a licença da OSMF pode mudar futuramente para outra licença aberta (como a Creative Commons) somente se houver voto majoritário por pelo menos 2/3 dos membros da OSMF 4. Que a OSMF concorda em fazer a devida atribuição ao Labgeo ou ao detentor do copyright, e que atualmente o local para isso é: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors Acho que seria justo acrescentar ao item 4 a questão de fazer a atribuição com a tag "source=Labgeo-UFRGS". Algumas observações sobre os itens acima: Item 1: entendo que isso não se aplicaria a dados futuros do Labgeo (como uma edição atualizada do Diagnóstico Ambiental), a menos que vocês digam que é permitido também. Item 2: a DbCL me parece apenas incluir a ODbL e acrescentar a isenção da OSMF da responsabilidade sobre os dados. Ela também ressalta que os dados da OSMF, se usados por um terceiro, podem ser "sublicenciados". Isso significa que tudo aquilo que for copiado da OSMF tem que ser disponibilizado sob a mesma licença, apenas dados novos poderiam ter outra licença. Item 3: da última vez que houve uma mudança de licença (da CC para a ODbL), cada usuário pôde votar se aceitava ou não a nova licença. As reversões foram feitas por usuário. Mas acho muito difícil que a licença mude, acompanho as listas da OSMF e não vejo ninguém falando sobre esse assunto. Por fim, sei que foi uma mensagem longa, então queria mais uma vez agradecer toda a atenção que vocês têm oferecido à comunidade do OSM. Um grande abraço, Fernando ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Simon Poole <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New contributing agency To: [email protected] (IMHO naturally) From a content pov, an agreement or a statement from a contributing agency should be based roughly on the terms laid down in the contributor terms ( http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms). They should mainly grant the OSMF the rights listed in (2) and it would be nice if they would make a statement to the fact that they actually own the necessary rights in the data to do so. Simon Am 20.11.2013 20:28, schrieb Fernando Trebien: It's a very similar situation indeed, Jaakko. Here such forms would take years to get processed sometimes, it all depends on the good will of who receives the request. I've noticed that this "will" is more responsive when the person knows how to answer, or at least knows who to delegate the request to (specially if this person is not a very specialized busy top manager), so simple and easy questions are more effective at getting a clear answer faster. Wish you luck as well! Fernando On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Jaakko Helleranta.com < [email protected]> wrote: > Same situation in Nicaragua. Many here say: Oh, it's all public domain! .. > where they merely mean, We have it and can give it to you. Or: It's online > and no one will protest (immediately at least) if you put it in OSM. > > The written permission (for which there are existing forms) is critical > -- and I'm afraid that you'll likely not get that... > > Wishing you all the best, of course. > > Cheers, > -Jaakko > > -- > [email protected] * Skype: jhelleranta * Mobile: +505-8845-3391 > (Nicaragua) > * Voice(mail) / SMS / What's app: +1-202-730-9778 * > http://about.me/jaakkoh > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Fernando Trebien < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you, Simon. You are correct, the LABGEO cartographers I have >> talked to don't seem to have access to any formal statement (contracts, >> laws, etc.) that ensures the data is truly "public domain" as they say. It >> is also possible that existing written statements would not clearly answer >> essential questions concerning ODbL compatibility. Considering some other >> problems (such as uninformed and uninterested Brazilian authorities, and >> lack of court decisions that would help us interpret the law), I believe >> that getting them to write down exactly what we need them to agree with >> would be safer for us and also more productive for us and for them. >> >> Since these authorities often erroneously equate "public domain" with >> "free" or "open" (not even knowing the differences between the two), I >> believe the questions for them should be: >> - how they expect their attribution to be visible to end users through >> OSM; and >> - whether the data can be used for commercial purposes. >> >> I don't know if these questions are enough, so I would like to hear >> your opinions and suggestions. >> >> Finally, we have already studied the data and found the conversion >> rather easy to do. Importing would probably require some coordinated >> effort, but for now it is the legal aspect that completely prevents us from >> beginning. Also, I think it would be fairer if the copyright page included >> a linked to the wiki page you mentioned, so that all contributors enjoy >> some similar level of visibility. >> >> Regards, >> >> Fernando >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Simon Poole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Fernando >>> >>> I gather from your questions that they are currently not distributing >>> the data under a (well-)known licence or on any other documented terms? >>> >>> In any case before spending to much effort on trying to nail down the >>> legal side, you really need to clarify if this is suitable data for OSM and >>> if yes, if there is a process that will result in something that is >>> digestible by the Brazilian community. So I would strongly suggest at least >>> starting with the steps outlined in >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines >>> >>> As to being mentioned on http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright , there >>> is no written in stone policy who gets on that page, in the past it seems >>> to have been used as an extra bargaining chip in negotiation. Being listed >>> there does not in any way indicate that the contributions are or were more >>> important than contributions from the individuals and organisations listed >>> here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors . Clearly there is >>> a practical desire to keep the list on the copyright page as short as >>> possible. Down the road we may have better mechanisms to build the >>> attribution pages and then that may change. So for now it would depend on >>> the outcome of any necessary negotiations. >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 14.11.2013 18:58, schrieb Fernando Trebien: >>> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I've recently contacted an institute (LABGEO) within a public university >>> here in Brazil (UFRGS) and they've shown interest in contributing to OSM >>> their data, which includes roads, land contours, vegetation data, maybe >>> even geological data (it is a pretty extensive database). They would also >>> like to be listed as a contributor here in this page: >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright >>> >>> Though there may be a few details left to check yet, they've stated so >>> far that the dada is already regularly used for commercial purposes by many >>> Brazilian companies at zero cost. So here's my question: what kind of >>> statement do they have to provide so that they get listed in that page? >>> What questions does the statement need to answer? >>> >>> -- >>> Fernando Trebien >>> +55 (51) 9962-5409 <%2B55%20%2851%29%209962-5409> >>> >>> "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) >>> "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law) >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> legal-talk mailing >>> [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> legal-talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Fernando Trebien >> +55 (51) 9962-5409 >> >> "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) >> "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> legal-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law) _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law)
_______________________________________________ Talk-br mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
